If it is indeed true, as you suggest
, that "there is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically"
, and black people are less intelligent (than white people, presumably) because that's in their genes, then would you please explain something to me?
In what sorts of environments, exactly, would selecting for stupidity (or even just *not* selecting for intelligence) equate with survival of the fittest???
Or how about this one. To whom is honest-to-god idiocy sexier than smarts?